
Of Shameless Devotion to Wealth, Privilege, and Empire
By Jason Miller
3/5/07
Consider this my mea culpa for publishing If You Hate America So Much, Why Don’t You Get the Hell Out! on my notoriously unorthodox sociopolitical blog, Thomas Paine’s Corner. When Jay Gould III, the former CEO of a major defense contractor, challenged me to post his viewpoint, I agreed to do so. This despite the fact that most of his positions clash violently with Thomas Paine’s Corner’s stated purpose, which is:
… advancing universal human rights, fostering social and economic justice, and supporting the cause of all oppressed, exploited, and impoverished human beings on our Earth.
After a series of email exchanges with my allies, publishers, partner sites, and with Gould, I realized that I had exercised poor judgment in putting his piece on my blog and in exercising my publishing privileges on his behalf on OpEd News. As Gould himself pointed out in a gleeful email (in which he called me his “useful idiot”), I had provided him with a means to reach online readers to advance his elitist agenda, which could easily have been learned at the knee of the Bush matriarch.
Upon reading Gould’s vituperative attack on minorities, dissidents, human rights, equality, economic justice, the rule of law, Chalmers Johnson, and a host of other progressive people, causes, and values, Jeff Rense of Rense.com assessed Gould by commenting:
“He’d have no problem manning the guard towers at death camps for dissident Americans…dissident meaning people who don’t agree with him. He’s possibly insane by some standards.”
In retrospect, I agree with Jeff. It is obvious that Jay Gould III, despite being an ostensibly respectable member of society, has some serious mental health issues and is badly in need of intensive therapy. His absence of compassion and empathy would probably indicate something on the order of narcissistic (or perhaps even anti-social) personality disorder. Obviously his position of privilege has enabled him to keep his pathologies hidden enough to avoid legal entanglements and maintain the wealth and influence that his kind craves. However, that makes him no less dangerous than an impoverished, uneducated individual with similar tendencies who has acted out by committing a violent crime.
Over the last few days he has flooded my inbox with emails. Virtually every time someone has posted a negative response to his harangue (which appeared on a number of sites), he has taken it personally and sent me an attack email. I have acquired a cyber-stalker of sorts, who delights in bombarding me with acrimonious missives. While it gets tiresome, it is actually more amusing than bothersome. When I envisage that bitter, terrified individual safely barricaded within his gated community making desperate attempts to preserve his pampered lifestyle and justify his loathsome existence, I feel an ambivalent blend of pathos and schadenfreude.
As I am wont to do in adverse circumstances (or after I have made a poor decision), I have made a conscious choice to find the silver lining in this situation. Mr. Gould has provided us with a rare opportunity. Dispensing with the deceitful rhetoric of benevolent intentions and baring his depraved soul, this mean-spirited member of the plutocracy has revealed a face of the
An analysis of a few points of Mr. Gould’s diatribe are highly instructive for those 6.4 billion (or so) of us not “fortunate” enough to have the option of casually urinating on the rest of humanity as a means of satisfying our sadistic impulses.
Gould mentioned that he was enraged by Chalmers Johnson’s opinions and conclusions about the
Attacking the alternative media on the Internet was an obvious reactionary move by Gould. The Internet is the last frontier of mass communication that is still relatively free of domination by major corporations (on which the
It is telling that Gould launched such vicious attacks upon “liberals”, “Communists”, and “Socialists”. For years we US Americans have been indoctrinated to believe that people subscribing to such “subversive” political or socioeconomic philosophies are threats to the
Men like Gould have a deeply vested interest in maintaining the utterly insane status quo. In perpetuating perhaps the most powerful mass delusion in the history of humankind, a bevy of moneyed concerns have acted to further their common objectives by enticing a majority of the remaining 298 million US Americans to devote their existences to further enriching those atop a brutal pyramid scheme which they fraudulently label “capitalism”. In reality, the post-feudal serfdom experienced by most human beings in the US sphere of influence does not remotely resemble Adam Smith’s (nor his contemporaries’) vision for humanity. Even if their notion of capitalism had evolved beyond the abstract, it is inconceivable that these men, who dwelt in a world where chattel slavery, monarchy, colonialism, and imperial expansionism were common practice, could have conceived of an economic scheme that could even begin to facilitate the existence of a society based on democratic principles or a government based upon constitutional republicanism.
Gould’s train truly jumped the rails when he started referring to a number of unindicted
Jay’s disdain for Black Americans, Native Americans, Latin Americans, and people of Middle Eastern descent coupled with his contempt for women, the homeless, non-Christians, the disabled, gays, and the mentally ill demonstrate that he does believe in a standard of equality, at least when it comes to discriminating and hating. Thanks, Mr. Gould. But we don’t need another reminder that the
I will take my hat off to Gould for one thing. It is truly astounding that in just three short decades he and his ilk have managed to severely sabotage over two hundred years worth of humanitarian social, economic, and political gains.
There is something distinctly perverse and morally depraved in celebrating the recent blows to habeas corpus and the Bill of Rights, suggesting the re-implementation of slavery, and stating that the Native American genocide was justified by the end results. Yet Gould did so. And frankly, it is difficult to imagine many of his peers amongst the ruling elite (like Dick Cheney for instance) disagreeing with him, in private at least. Even if some yielded to the dictates of reason and conscience by taking exception to Gould’s praise for torture and genocide, it is infinitely more difficult to imagine them breaking a sweat to pursue justice for the victims.
Gould stated he was “speaking out for Bush’s ‘Silent Minority.’” I do give him credit for his brutal honesty. Gould’s jeremiad affirmed that the
What Jay Gould III and his opulent cohorts need to realize is that they are destined to fail in their hubristic and avaricious quest to perpetually subjugate and exploit those whom they perceive to be their “inferiors”. Those of us who draw our inspiration from the Abolitionists, the Women Suffragists, labor organizers, civil rights activists, environmentalists, and anti-war activists are a determined lot. Our “base” is much larger than that of the likes of George Bush—despite the fact that many amongst the poor and working class have been deluded into aligning themselves with their oppressors. Most importantly, our moral right will ultimately vanquish their monetary and military might.
My good friend Patrice Greanville, editor of Cyrano’s Journal Online, recently reminded me that "patience is more important to a sincere revolutionist than courage or even intelligence." It is only a matter of time before our efforts bear fruit, and I am prepared to strive tenaciously until the pendulum swings toward equality and justice.
Your beloved empire is crumbling, Mr. Gould. Enjoy your affluence while you and your fellow patricians still can.







4 comments:
Jason, I have the good fortune to not know Mr Gould - luckily his empire does not extend much into British shores. So when I read his article I thought it was a wind-up, an amusing piece of ironic writing by someone with a made-up name. I still can't quite believe that it was for real.
But assuming it was, I have to say I disagree with your view that you were wrong to publish it. You can see why someone with Mr Gould's twisted perspective might think you were his 'useful idiot', but recall Voltaire: 'I disagree with everything you say but will defend to the death your right to say it'.
Your willingness to publish views by the likes of Mr Gould give your site far more credibility than any puiblication Mr Gould is likely to sponsor.
Don't change a thing is my view.
I, for one, would not even attempt to help this man with his mental health problems. He is a sociopath, no conscience, no guilt, no heart. His kind are incurable.
Long time Psychologist
I believe it is more important for us to understand than to just refute positions we want to reject. This guy seems to understand little. He makes accusations, but with little discussion, his position seems to be nothing more than "name-calling." I thought his efforts were inneffectual because his claims were not based on any real understanding of the people he was talking about. So, we should find some better representative of the positions we want to resist.
He seems to be basing his argument, whatever there is of one, on his own opinions. He doesn't say, "and it's not just me who thinks this way..." He otherwise brings us no evidence. He provides no reason for us to give any weight or credibility at all to what he says. I remember quite a bit of bile at vast swaths of the American population. He gave us no reason to think he was talking about anything more than his own racist, homophobic, mad ravings.
How sad.
I want to question whether this guy is real. Or, have we some kind of straw man argument created for us to give us some weak notion of who we're up against? I can imagine that someone might want to write a similar piece describing themselves as a leftist in vile terms and send it out to righties.
Should we take seriously this thin smelly argument as any kind of representation of the positions we really need to be addressing?
Once I played 2moons, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have 2moons dil. He gave me some 2moons gold, he said that I could buy 2moons dil, but I did not have money, then I played it all my spare time. From then on, I got some 2moon dil, if I did not continue to play it, I can sell cheap 2moons gold to anyone who want.
Post a Comment